The week in analyst ratings: September 14, 2026
19 upgrades, 11 downgrades and 39 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
Original, fact-checked research. Every piece draws on multiple sources and is built by the StockRank editorial pipeline.
19 upgrades, 11 downgrades and 39 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
4 upgrades, 3 downgrades and 7 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
19 upgrades, 14 downgrades and 4 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
12 upgrades, 24 downgrades and 5 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
25 upgrades, 26 downgrades and 22 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week, and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
16 upgrades, 12 downgrades and 16 new initiations across ~500 US large caps this week — and which firms' calls have the track records to back them.
We evaluated 42,000+ analyst rating windows across ~500 US large caps against the S&P 500. The results argue for reading the byline, not just the rating.
Across ~500 US large caps, these are the buy-rated stocks trading furthest below the average analyst price target, and what that gap does and doesn't mean.
The consensus is bullish and the multiple looks cheap, but the spread between the high and low targets is the number that actually matters.
Semis, neoclouds, and AI software increasingly rise and fall on a single thesis. For a portfolio, that correlation is the risk no price target prices in.
A stock priced above its average analyst target looks overvalued on paper. Sometimes it just means the average hasn't caught up.