Where Wall Street sees the most upside: week of July 27, 2026
The buy-rated large caps trading furthest below their average analyst price target this week, with at least 20 covering analysts.
Every week, StockRank screens its ~500-stock US large-cap coverage for the widest gaps between the current price and the average 12-month analyst target, restricted to buy-or-better consensus with at least 20 covering analysts, so one boutique's exuberance can't dominate. Here's the screen as of July 27, 2026.
The widest gaps to the average target
| Ticker | Company | Analysts | Avg target | Price | Implied gap | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | ORCL | Oracle Corporation | 41 | $248.15 | $114.99 | +115.8% | | APP | AppLovin Corporation | 30 | $654.60 | $391.98 | +67.0% | | BSX | Boston Scientific Corporation | 28 | $72.43 | $44.25 | +63.7% | | MU | Micron Technology, Inc. | 42 | $1,507.38 | $920.95 | +63.7% | | ALB | Albemarle Corporation | 20 | $187.91 | $114.85 | +63.6% | | TEAM | Atlassian Corporation | 30 | $139.70 | $86.88 | +60.8% | | CSGP | CoStar Group, Inc. | 20 | $43.95 | $27.66 | +58.9% | | UBER | Uber Technologies, Inc. | 48 | $104.10 | $65.94 | +57.9% | | INTU | Intuit Inc. | 33 | $462.53 | $296.33 | +56.1% | | SNDK | Sandisk Corporation | 22 | $2,217.77 | $1,436.56 | +54.4% |
Data: analyst consensus and price targets via Yahoo Finance (delayed), aggregated by StockRank. Figures move daily: the live screener is the source of truth.
How to read it
The ten stocks displayed here all carry buy ratings from an average of 20 to 48 analysts each, yet trade at substantial discounts to their collective price targets. Oracle leads by gap size at 115.8%, followed by AppLovin at 67.0% and Boston Scientific at 63.7%. Such spreads raise a natural question: do they reflect analyst conviction about upside potential, or have targets simply failed to reset lower following recent price declines?
The answer requires examining when these ratings and targets were last updated. A wide gap paired with fresh buy initiations or price target raises suggests analysts see genuine value at current levels. Conversely, a gap coupled with stale research from months prior points to targets that haven't caught up to shifted market sentiment. The recency of analyst actions on these names would clarify whether the discrepancy represents opportunity or deterioration since the ratings were set.
All ten stocks carry buy ratings overall, indicating analyst consensus leans positive. Yet the magnitude of spread between target and price across the group is striking enough to warrant checking whether recent analyst commentary has reinforced these views or whether the action has simply moved faster than research updates.
The necessary caveats
Everything above is a descriptive snapshot of third-party analyst opinions (via Yahoo Finance, delayed), aggregated by StockRank. Ratings and price targets are the published views of the named firms, not StockRank's, and historical accuracy does not guarantee future results. Nothing in this article is investment advice or a recommendation. Methodology (windows, benchmark, minimum samples) is published in full here.
Explore the live, filterable version of this screen in the StockRank screener.